Affordable Housing Strategies: Can We Avoid A Market Crash? The Gregor Robertson Model

Axel S�rensen

5 min read

Post on May 27, 2025

4.8

Share

Understanding the Gregor Robertson Model & its Context

Gregor Robertson served as the Mayor of Vancouver from 2008 to 2018. During his tenure, Vancouver faced a severe affordable housing crisis characterized by skyrocketing housing costs, limited housing supply, and increasing homelessness. His administration implemented a comprehensive set of affordable housing strategies aimed at increasing the supply of affordable housing while simultaneously preventing market speculation and ensuring a more diverse housing landscape. The overarching goal was to create a more equitable and stable housing market for all Vancouverites.

• Focus on increased density in appropriate areas: This involved rezoning initiatives to allow for taller buildings and more units per acre, particularly near transit corridors.
• Emphasis on diverse housing options: The model promoted a mix of rental apartments, condominiums, and social housing to cater to a wider range of income levels and housing needs.
• Investment in transit-oriented development: This strategy aimed to reduce reliance on cars, making housing more accessible and affordable by proximity to public transportation.
• Streamlining development approvals: The Robertson administration worked to expedite the approval process for affordable housing projects to speed up construction and increase supply.

Key Strategies Employed in the Gregor Robertson Model

Increased Density and Zoning Reform

A cornerstone of the Gregor Robertson model was significant zoning reform to permit higher-density housing. This involved amending bylaws to allow for taller buildings and more residential units in specific areas, primarily near transit lines. While this faced opposition from some residents concerned about neighborhood character changes, the initiative significantly increased the potential for new housing construction.

• Examples of specific zoning changes: The city rezoned many areas to allow for increased height restrictions and density bonuses for developments incorporating affordable housing units.
• Analysis of the impact on housing affordability and supply: While data is complex and multifaceted, studies suggest that increased density contributed to a modest increase in housing supply, although the impact on overall affordability is still debated.
• Addressing concerns about neighborhood character and community impact: The city attempted to address these concerns through community engagement processes and design guidelines aimed at maintaining neighborhood character while increasing density.
• Specific projects resulting from this: Several large-scale developments, incorporating both market and affordable units, were made possible by these zoning changes.

Inclusionary Zoning and Developer Incentives

The Robertson administration implemented inclusionary zoning, requiring developers of larger projects to include a certain percentage of affordable units within their developments. This was complemented by various incentives to encourage participation from developers.

• Details about the percentage requirements: The specific percentage of affordable units mandated varied depending on the project's location and size.
• Types of incentives provided: These included density bonuses, expedited permitting processes, and tax breaks.
• Analysis of the success rate: While the inclusionary zoning program resulted in some affordable units, it faced challenges in attracting developers, particularly during periods of high land costs.
• Case studies: Specific projects that successfully utilized these incentives provide examples of the model's effectiveness, but others illustrate the challenges faced.

Investment in Social Housing and Community Land Trusts

Significant investment was made in social housing and community land trusts during Robertson's tenure. This ensured long-term affordability by focusing on units that remained perpetually affordable, not subject to market fluctuations.

• Number of social housing units created or renovated: The administration initiated numerous projects, resulting in hundreds of new social housing units.
• Explanation of the community land trust model: Community land trusts are non-profit organizations that own land in perpetuity, leasing it to residents at affordable rates. This ensures long-term affordability.
• Long-term affordability measures: Rent restrictions and other measures were built into these projects to maintain affordability for future generations.
• Funding sources: Funding came from various sources, including federal and provincial grants, municipal bonds, and private donations.

Assessing the Successes and Limitations of the Model

The Gregor Robertson model achieved some successes in increasing the supply of affordable housing and promoting diverse housing options in Vancouver. However, it also faced limitations and unintended consequences.

• Quantifiable data on changes in housing affordability and availability: Although increased supply was achieved, affordability remains a challenge. Data shows a modest improvement in certain sectors but not a complete solution to the crisis.
• Successes in specific neighborhoods or demographics: Some neighborhoods saw a noticeable increase in affordable housing options, but the impact was uneven across different demographics.
• Areas where the model struggled: Gentrification and displacement remain major concerns, particularly in areas undergoing rapid density increases. The model did not fully address the affordability challenges faced by low-income individuals and families.
• Discussions about displacement and gentrification: While the intent was to increase affordability, the increased demand in some areas led to unintended consequences, pushing out existing lower-income residents.

Lessons Learned and Applicability to Other Cities

The Gregor Robertson model provides valuable lessons for other cities facing similar affordable housing crises. Its emphasis on increased density, inclusionary zoning, and social housing investment can be adapted to suit different contexts.

• Factors to consider when adapting: Local zoning laws, political climate, community support, and land availability are crucial factors.
• Examples of cities: Other cities have successfully implemented elements of this model with varying degrees of success.
• Challenges in replication: Successfully replicating this model requires addressing local political realities, addressing concerns about community displacement, securing funding, and managing stakeholder expectations.

Conclusion

The Gregor Robertson model offers valuable insights into crafting effective affordable housing strategies. While not a panacea, its emphasis on increased density, inclusionary zoning, and investment in social housing demonstrates the potential for mitigating housing crises and preventing market crashes. By learning from both its successes and limitations, cities worldwide can develop tailored approaches that address their unique challenges, ultimately achieving a more equitable and stable housing market. To learn more about innovative affordable housing strategies and avoid potential market crashes, explore further research on the Gregor Robertson model and related initiatives.