MCP Project Name Bug: Server Name Not Included

by Axel Sørensen 47 views

Hey guys! We've got a bug report here that needs our attention. It's about how the project names are generated when connecting to an MCP server from the My Connectors page. Let's dive in and see what's going on.

Describe the Bug

When connecting to an MCP server from the My Connectors page, the project that gets created doesn't use the user-provided server name. This can be a bit confusing, especially when you're trying to keep things organized. Essentially, the project name should reflect the custom server name that the user inputs during the connection process, but it's currently defaulting to a generic name instead. This issue affects user experience by making it harder to quickly identify and manage different server connections within the platform. When users input a specific name, they expect that name to be used consistently, and the current behavior deviates from this expectation, potentially leading to confusion and inefficiency. To illustrate, imagine a scenario where a user connects to multiple MySQL servers, each serving a different purpose. If all projects are named similarly (e.g., "MySQL - ProjectID"), it becomes cumbersome to distinguish between them at a glance. This lack of clarity can hinder productivity, particularly in environments where numerous databases and servers are in use. Therefore, resolving this bug is crucial for enhancing the usability and overall efficiency of the platform, ensuring that users can easily manage and interact with their server connections.

To Reproduce

Here are the steps to reproduce the bug:

  1. Navigate to the My Connectors page.
  2. In the Available Connectors list, connect to any MCP server (for example, MySQL).
  3. Provide a value for the optional Server Name field (e.g., sangeesql).
  4. Initiate a chat with this server.

After following these steps, you'll notice that the project created doesn't use the server name you provided. Instead, it uses a generic name like MySQL - <project-id>. This is the crux of the bug – the system is ignoring the custom server name input by the user. This issue can be reproduced consistently across different types of MCP servers, which indicates a systemic problem in how project names are generated. The discrepancy between the expected behavior (using the custom server name) and the actual behavior (using a generic name) can cause significant workflow disruptions, especially for users who manage multiple server connections. By addressing this bug, we can ensure a more intuitive and user-friendly experience, aligning the platform's functionality with user expectations and enhancing overall productivity. This fix will not only improve clarity but also reduce the potential for errors arising from misidentification of server connections. The steps outlined above are straightforward, allowing developers and testers to quickly verify the bug and its resolution once a fix is implemented.

Observed Behavior

When you connect to an MCP server and provide a custom server name, the project created uses a generic name like MySQL - <project-id>. This is not the expected behavior. A screenshot is provided to illustrate the issue:

Image

This generic naming convention obscures the user's custom input, which is intended to help them identify and manage their connections more effectively. The observed behavior not only contradicts the user's effort in providing a specific server name but also introduces a layer of inconvenience in distinguishing between different projects. Imagine a scenario where a user is managing multiple MySQL databases, each designated for a different client or purpose. If all the projects are named uniformly (e.g., "MySQL - Project1", "MySQL - Project2"), the user would need to delve deeper into each project to ascertain its specific connection details. This extra step not only wastes time but also increases the likelihood of errors, such as inadvertently executing queries on the wrong database. The issue is further compounded in environments with numerous server connections, where the lack of distinct naming makes it increasingly challenging to maintain organizational clarity. By rectifying this bug, we can ensure that the platform respects the user's input and provides a more intuitive way to manage server connections, ultimately enhancing the user experience and reducing the potential for operational errors. The visual evidence provided in the screenshot clearly underscores the discrepancy between the user's intended naming and the actual project name generated by the system.

Expected Behavior

The project name should use the user-provided Server Name. For example, if the user provides sangeesql as the Server Name, the project should be named sangeesql instead of MySQL - <project-id>. This ensures that users can easily identify and manage their server connections based on the names they've provided. The expected behavior streamlines the user workflow by aligning the project name with the user's mental model of their server connections. This consistency is crucial for maintaining clarity, especially when dealing with a large number of projects. By using the custom server name, the platform empowers users to quickly locate and interact with the correct server, reducing the risk of errors and enhancing overall productivity. Imagine a scenario where a user has several databases, each serving a distinct application or client. If the projects are named according to the custom server names, the user can instantly recognize the relevant project without having to inspect the connection details. This intuitive naming convention is particularly beneficial in collaborative environments, where multiple team members might be accessing the same platform. By adopting the user-provided server name, the platform not only simplifies project management but also fosters a more user-friendly and efficient experience. Furthermore, this enhancement aligns with the principles of good software design, which emphasize consistency and predictability in user interfaces. The anticipated outcome of implementing this fix is a more intuitive and manageable environment for users to interact with their server connections.

By fixing this bug, we can make the platform more user-friendly and efficient. Let's get this sorted out!