Jeff Goldblum's Perspective: The Original And Revised Ending Of The Fly

Axel S�rensen

5 min read

Post on Apr 29, 2025

4.0

Share

The Original Ending: A Deeper Dive into Cronenberg's Vision

David Cronenberg's original vision for The Fly's ending was far more bleak and uncompromising than what audiences ultimately saw. This original ending, detailed in early scripts and production notes, offered a far more visceral and disturbing conclusion to Seth Brundle’s tragic transformation. Key differences from the released version are significant:

• Specific details about the original ending's visual and narrative elements: Instead of the relatively contained and somewhat ambiguous final scene in the released version, the original ending reportedly depicted a more explicit and horrifying image of Brundle’s final state – a truly grotesque and disturbing metamorphosis beyond what made the final cut. This visual element was crucial in showcasing the full horror of Cronenberg's body horror vision.

• Analysis of the original ending's thematic implications: The original ending further emphasized the themes of scientific hubris and the terrifying consequences of unchecked ambition. The increased level of Brundle's degradation would have amplified the film’s exploration of the dangers of scientific experimentation without ethical boundaries.

• Why Cronenberg might have chosen the revised ending: While the reasons aren't definitively documented, it's likely that studio pressure played a role. A more ambiguous, less visually shocking ending might have been deemed more commercially viable, potentially broadening the film's appeal to a wider audience. Imagine Goldblum’s reaction – a seasoned actor comfortable with challenging material, he might have appreciated the original ending's unflinching depiction of Brundle’s fate, aligning with his known preference for complex and morally ambiguous roles.

The Revised Ending: A More Commercial Approach?

The revised ending of The Fly, while still tragic, offers a degree of closure and emotional resonance absent from Cronenberg's original vision. This change almost certainly reflects the influence of studio executives who often prioritize commercial appeal.

• Specific differences between the original and revised endings: The most striking difference lies in the portrayal of Brundle’s final form and the emotional impact on Veronica. The revised version tones down the visual horror, focusing more on the emotional devastation of Brundle’s transformation and Veronica’s grief.

• Analyze the potential influence of studio executives: Studio interference in the final product is common in Hollywood, and it’s plausible that the studio pushed for a less graphic ending to broaden the film’s potential audience and avoid alienating viewers. The change to a more palatable ending likely aimed for a wider box office success, maximizing profitability.

• Discuss the impact of the revised ending on audience reception and critical analysis: The revised ending, while less visually shocking, arguably impacted the film's emotional resonance. Though some might argue it weakened the film’s thematic power, it likely contributed to its wider acceptance and critical acclaim, even if it wasn’t Cronenberg's original artistic intent. Did the softer ending influence Goldblum's performance? This remains a question, but the nuances of his acting suggest he could adjust to any directorial vision.

Jeff Goldblum's Hypothetical Perspective: An Actor's Insight

This section speculates on Jeff Goldblum's potential thoughts on both versions of The Fly's ending. Remember, this is hypothetical, based on his known career and public persona.

• Analyze Goldblum's known preferences for complex characters and challenging roles: Goldblum has a history of taking on complex and often morally ambiguous characters. He's known for embracing the nuances of a role, suggesting he likely would have appreciated the thematic depth of the original, more disturbing ending.

• Analyze past interviews where Goldblum has discussed his approach to acting and collaborating with directors: In interviews, Goldblum often expresses respect for his directors' visions. He might have accepted either version, understanding the creative and commercial pressures at play.

• Hypothetical quotes from Goldblum regarding his preference: "Honestly, I'm fascinated by both endings. The original would have been a truly shocking experience for audiences, and that's exciting. But the revised ending allows for a potent emotional impact. I trust David Cronenberg's artistic vision completely, and I'm sure there were good reasons for the changes." (This is a hypothetical quote).

Conclusion: The Enduring Legacy of The Fly

The Fly's original and revised endings represent distinct creative choices, each contributing to the film’s enduring legacy. The original ending emphasized uncompromising body horror and the terrifying consequences of scientific ambition, while the revised ending prioritized emotional resonance and wider audience appeal. Our hypothetical look into Jeff Goldblum's perspective suggests he'd likely appreciate the artistry of both versions, understanding the creative process and the considerations involved in filmmaking. Ultimately, both endings contribute to the film's power.

What's your take on The Fly's ending? Share your thoughts in the comments below and let's continue the discussion around Jeff Goldblum's unforgettable performance and the film's enduring impact!